Post-Judgment Divorce Disputes in San Diego County: What They Are and How They Work

If you are in immediate danger, call 911.

Most people facing a post-judgment problem thought the hard part was over. Then support stopped arriving, the house was never refinanced, a parent began ignoring the parenting schedule, or a job loss or a move made the old orders unworkable. The question underneath the search is usually the same: does the judgment still bind everyone, and what can the court actually do about it now? This article walks through that question piece by piece, from what stays open after judgment to how the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego handles a contested post-judgment matter.

A divorce judgment ends the marriage and resolves the issues in the case as of the day the court enters it: marital status, property, support and custody. That moment is the dividing line. Anything filed in the same case number afterward is a post-judgment proceeding, whether it is a request to change an order, a request to enforce one, or a request to address something the judgment never resolved.

The judgment is final, but not every part of it is frozen. The court keeps continuing jurisdiction, meaning ongoing power to revisit an issue, over child custody, child support and spousal support. Family Code section 3651 provides that a support order generally "may be modified or terminated at any time as the court determines to be necessary," subject to exceptions written into the statute. Property division works differently. Once the judgment is entered and the time to challenge it has passed, the division is generally final.

Family Code section 215 is often described as the source of the court's continuing custody jurisdiction, but that is not what it does. It is a notice rule. After a judgment of dissolution, or after a permanent order involving custody, visitation or support of a child, no modification and no later order is valid unless any required notice is served on the party, generally in the manner the law otherwise allows. The statute adds: "service upon the attorney of record is not sufficient." In practice, that means a post-judgment request has to reach the other person directly. Serving the lawyer who handled the divorce is not enough.

The case file and jurisdiction stay with the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, which is why post-judgment requests are filed in the original case rather than started fresh.

California courts generally require a parent who wants to change a final custody order to show a significant change of circumstances affecting the child's welfare. The rule exists to protect stability. A child's schedule, school and home are not reopened every time a parent is unhappy with how the order turned out. For joint custody, Family Code section 3087 allows modification or termination "if it is shown that the best interest of the child requires" it. If either parent opposes the change, the court must state its reasons.

When a request to change custody or visitation is contested, Family Code section 3170(a) provides that "the court shall set the contested issues for mediation." That step is mandatory, not optional. In San Diego County, that mediation is child custody recommending counseling with the court's Family Court Services. Under Family Code section 3183(a), the mediator, called a child custody recommending counselor, may, consistent with local court rules, submit a recommendation to the court on custody or visitation, if it is first provided in writing to the parties and their attorneys before the hearing. Family Court Services calls this person the Family Court Counselor. According to Family Court Services, if no agreement is reached, the counselor makes a recommendation and the court hearing proceeds. The recommendation can carry weight, but the judge decides. Domestic violence cases are handled by Family Court Services in accordance with a separate written protocol approved by the Judicial Council (section 3170(b)).

The judge measures the request against the best-interest factors of Family Code section 3011. They include the health, safety and welfare of the child; any history of abuse by one parent or another person seeking custody against the child or the other parent; the habitual or continual illegal use of controlled substances, the habitual or continual abuse of alcohol, or the habitual or continual abuse of prescribed controlled substances; and the nature and amount of contact with both parents. Under Family Code section 3040(a)(1), when granting custody to either parent, the court considers, among other factors, which parent is more likely to allow the child frequent and continuing contact with the noncustodial parent, consistent with sections 3011 and 3020.

Domestic violence changes the analysis. Under Family Code section 3044(a), a finding that a parent perpetrated domestic violence within the previous five years against the other party, the child, the child's siblings or certain other people creates a rebuttable presumption that awarding that parent sole or joint physical or legal custody is detrimental to the child. It can be rebutted only by a preponderance of the evidence, and under section 3044(b)(1) neither the preference for frequent and continuing contact with both parents (section 3020(b)) nor the preference for contact with the noncustodial parent (section 3040(a)(1)) may be used to rebut it, in whole or in part.

Some post-judgment situations cannot wait for a regular hearing. Family Code section 3064(a) bars an ex parte custody order, one made on short notice without a full hearing, "unless there has been a showing of immediate harm to the child or immediate risk that the child will be removed from the State of California." Under section 3064(b), immediate harm includes, among other things, a parent's recent or continuing acts of domestic violence and recent or continuing sexual abuse of the child, and the court must consider a parent's illegal access to firearms and ammunition. More on that standard appears in the explainer on emergency custody orders, and the wider process is covered under custody battles in San Diego.

Child support can change after judgment when circumstances change. Typical examples include a substantial change in either parent's income, a change in the child's needs, or a change in the parenting-time schedule. Any of these can shift the numbers enough to justify a new order.

The new amount is calculated with the same statewide uniform guideline used at the start of the case. Family Code section 4055 sets it out as a formula, CS = K[HN - (H%)(TN)], where HN is the high earner's net monthly disposable income and H% is the approximate percentage of time the high earner has primary physical responsibility for the children. A modification runs that formula on the parents' current circumstances, not the ones that existed at the time of the divorce.

Timing matters more than many people expect. A change in support generally cannot reach back before the request to modify was filed, even if the job loss or raise happened months earlier. Waiting can mean months of the old amount staying in place.

Current finances drive the result, so each party files a current income and expense declaration when support is at issue. Parents who agree on a new figure can put it in a stipulation, but it becomes an enforceable court order only once the court approves it. Disputes over imputed or hidden income are discussed in more depth on the page about child and spousal support disputes.

Spousal support, sometimes called alimony, is generally modifiable after judgment under Family Code section 3651, subject to the statute's exceptions, which can include the terms of the parties' own agreement. A judgment that says nothing about modifiability generally leaves support within the court's power to change. The party asking for a change must show a material change of circumstances since the last order.

Family Code section 4320 lists the circumstances the court considers in ordering spousal support, including whether each party's earning capacity is enough to maintain the marital standard of living and the supported party's marketable skills and need for training. The section also includes the goal that the supported party become self-supporting within a reasonable period. A related court advisement, often called a Gavron warning after the case that established it, tells the supported spouse that they are expected to make reasonable good-faith efforts toward self-support. A later lack of effort can become part of a modification request.

Some events end support without a motion. Family Code section 4337 provides that, "except as otherwise agreed by the parties in writing," support ends on the death of either party or the remarriage of the supported party. Cohabitation is different. Under Family Code section 4323(a), unless the parties agreed otherwise in writing, cohabiting with a nonmarital partner creates a rebuttable presumption of decreased need, and the court may modify or terminate support once it determines circumstances have changed. Cohabitation does not end support automatically; a court finding is needed. The income of the paying spouse's new spouse or partner is not considered (section 4323(b)).

A judgment's handling of support after a long marriage deserves a careful read. An order setting support at zero while reserving jurisdiction keeps the door open to a later request. A clear termination of jurisdiction generally closes it. The difference often turns on the exact words in the judgment.

Disclosure rules sit behind every support agreement. Under Family Code section 2105(a), each party serves a final declaration of disclosure and a current income and expense declaration before or at the time the parties agree on property or support issues other than temporary support, or, if the case goes to trial, no later than 45 days before the first assigned trial date. A mutual waiver of the final declaration must be executed under penalty of perjury in open court or by separate stipulation (section 2105(d)).

A divorce judgment is a court order, and Family Code section 290 gives the court broad tools to enforce it: "execution, the appointment of a receiver, or contempt, or by any other order as the court in its discretion determines from time to time to be necessary." Enforcement requests go to the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, in the same case.

Contempt is the most serious of those tools. Code of Civil Procedure section 1209 lists acts that are contempts of the court's authority, including disobedience of a lawful court order. In family court, contempt generally turns on a valid order, the other party's knowledge of it, and a willful failure to obey, and it can carry penalties. Because the consequences are significant, the procedure is strict. The step-by-step process is laid out in the guide to contempt in family court.

For support, Family Code section 5230 requires the court, when it orders or modifies support, to include an earnings assignment order directing the paying party's employer to pay the support from earnings, along with an amount toward any arrears. Support then comes out of the paycheck instead of depending on voluntary payment.

Property orders that sit unperformed, such as a house never transferred or retirement funds never split, can be addressed through the "any other order" language of section 290. Retirement division also commonly requires a separate order that the plan accepts, and a judgment that divided an account without that follow-up order is a frequent reason cases come back to court.

Enforcement and modification are separate tracks. Filing a request to change an order does not suspend the existing one. The order stays in effect, and must be followed, until the court changes it.

Property division is where post-judgment law is narrowest. Unlike support and custody, the division is generally final once the judgment is entered and the time to challenge it has passed. Two exceptions come up most often in contested cases.

The first is omitted property. Family Code section 2556 gives the court continuing jurisdiction to award community assets or debts that the judgment never adjudicated, through a post-judgment motion in the same case. The court "shall equally divide" the omitted asset or debt, unless it finds on good cause that the interests of justice require an unequal division.

The second is a set-aside motion under Family Code section 2122, which asks the court to vacate all or part of the judgment. Its grounds include actual fraud, where a party was kept in ignorance or otherwise fraudulently prevented from fully participating, and perjury in the preliminary or final declaration of disclosure, the waiver of the final declaration, or the income and expense statement. A fraud motion must be brought within one year after the party discovered, or should have discovered, the fraud. Other grounds carry their own statutory deadlines, so the applicable period depends on the specific ground. Hidden assets and disclosure failures, and the discovery tools used to prove them, are discussed further on the page about financial disputes in divorce.

Reimbursement claims can surface here too. Under Family Code section 2640, a spouse who put traceable separate-property money toward acquiring community property is reimbursed, unless that spouse made a written waiver or signed a writing that has that effect. A section 2640 claim the judgment never addressed may be an omitted issue. Moore/Marsden apportionment is the opposite situation: community money paying down a loan on one spouse's separate-property home. The two are not interchangeable.

Business interests raise their own questions. A business's value can include goodwill, and that value is decided on the evidence, often with experts. If a business was undervalued because information was concealed, that concealment may support a set-aside motion.

A post-judgment matter is filed in the same case as the original divorce, in the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. The usual vehicle is a Request for Order, the standard motion in California family law, supported by declarations and, where support is at issue, current income and expense declarations from both parties.

Service is the step that most often trips people up. As section 215 provides, a post-judgment modification is valid only if required notice is served on the party, not just a former attorney. Whether personal service or mail is permitted depends on the type of relief sought.

From there, the path depends on the issue. Contested custody or visitation goes to Family Court Services for child custody recommending counseling before the hearing. Support and enforcement requests go to a hearing, and some matters can be resolved on the papers. Urgent requests can be brought on an ex parte basis, but the bar for that relief is higher than for a regularly noticed motion. Emergency procedure is covered on the page about emergency family court orders.

The court's own site, sdcourt.ca.gov, is the source for current local procedures and forms, and self-represented parties can use the court's self-help center. Statewide guidance is available through the California Courts Self-Help Guide, and Judicial Council forms are published at courts.ca.gov.

Post-judgment disputes turn on details that are easy to miss: the exact wording of the judgment, whether jurisdiction over support was reserved, when circumstances changed, what was disclosed and when, and whether the other side was properly served. A conversation about a specific case tends to focus on those facts, on which path fits (modification, enforcement or a set-aside), and on what evidence the court would need to see. San Diego Family Law Advocates practises California family law only, so the conversation stays with what a California court can do.

To talk through how these rules apply to your judgment, contact San Diego Family Law Advocates to request a confidential consultation.